chore: Version 0.3 #136
|
@ -210,8 +210,8 @@ protected def GoalState.continue (target: GoalState) (branch: GoalState): Except
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
target.resume (goals := branch.goals)
|
target.resume (goals := branch.goals)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
protected def GoalState.rootExpr? (goalState: GoalState): Option Expr :=
|
protected def GoalState.rootExpr? (goalState: GoalState): Option Expr := do
|
||||||
let expr := goalState.mctx.eAssignment.find! goalState.root
|
let expr ← goalState.mctx.eAssignment.find? goalState.root
|
||||||
let (expr, _) := instantiateMVarsCore (mctx := goalState.mctx) (e := expr)
|
let (expr, _) := instantiateMVarsCore (mctx := goalState.mctx) (e := expr)
|
||||||
if expr.hasMVar then
|
if expr.hasMVar then
|
||||||
-- Must not assert that the goal state is empty here. We could be in a branch goal.
|
-- Must not assert that the goal state is empty here. We could be in a branch goal.
|
||||||
|
@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ protected def GoalState.rootExpr? (goalState: GoalState): Option Expr :=
|
||||||
.none
|
.none
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
assert! goalState.goals.isEmpty
|
assert! goalState.goals.isEmpty
|
||||||
.some expr
|
return expr
|
||||||
protected def GoalState.parentExpr? (goalState: GoalState): Option Expr := do
|
protected def GoalState.parentExpr? (goalState: GoalState): Option Expr := do
|
||||||
let parent ← goalState.parentMVar
|
let parent ← goalState.parentMVar
|
||||||
let expr := goalState.mctx.eAssignment.find! parent
|
let expr := goalState.mctx.eAssignment.find! parent
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -210,6 +210,8 @@ def proof_or_comm: TestM Unit := do
|
||||||
| .none => do
|
| .none => do
|
||||||
addTest $ assertUnreachable "Goal could not parse"
|
addTest $ assertUnreachable "Goal could not parse"
|
||||||
return ()
|
return ()
|
||||||
|
addTest $ LSpec.check "(0 parent)" state0.parentExpr?.isNone
|
||||||
|
addTest $ LSpec.check "(0 root)" state0.rootExpr?.isNone
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let state1 ← match ← state0.execute (goalId := 0) (tactic := "intro p q h") with
|
let state1 ← match ← state0.execute (goalId := 0) (tactic := "intro p q h") with
|
||||||
| .success state => pure state
|
| .success state => pure state
|
||||||
|
@ -218,6 +220,8 @@ def proof_or_comm: TestM Unit := do
|
||||||
return ()
|
return ()
|
||||||
addTest $ LSpec.check "intro n m" ((← state1.serializeGoals (options := ← read)).map (·.devolatilize) =
|
addTest $ LSpec.check "intro n m" ((← state1.serializeGoals (options := ← read)).map (·.devolatilize) =
|
||||||
#[buildGoal [("p", "Prop"), ("q", "Prop"), ("h", "p ∨ q")] "q ∨ p"])
|
#[buildGoal [("p", "Prop"), ("q", "Prop"), ("h", "p ∨ q")] "q ∨ p"])
|
||||||
|
addTest $ LSpec.check "(1 parent)" state1.parentExpr?.isSome
|
||||||
|
addTest $ LSpec.check "(1 root)" state1.rootExpr?.isNone
|
||||||
let state2 ← match ← state1.execute (goalId := 0) (tactic := "cases h") with
|
let state2 ← match ← state1.execute (goalId := 0) (tactic := "cases h") with
|
||||||
| .success state => pure state
|
| .success state => pure state
|
||||||
| other => do
|
| other => do
|
||||||
|
@ -225,6 +229,8 @@ def proof_or_comm: TestM Unit := do
|
||||||
return ()
|
return ()
|
||||||
addTest $ LSpec.check "cases h" ((← state2.serializeGoals (options := ← read)).map (·.devolatilize) =
|
addTest $ LSpec.check "cases h" ((← state2.serializeGoals (options := ← read)).map (·.devolatilize) =
|
||||||
#[branchGoal "inl" "p", branchGoal "inr" "q"])
|
#[branchGoal "inl" "p", branchGoal "inr" "q"])
|
||||||
|
addTest $ LSpec.check "(2 parent)" state2.parentExpr?.isSome
|
||||||
|
addTest $ LSpec.check "(2 root)" state2.rootExpr?.isNone
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let state3_1 ← match ← state2.execute (goalId := 0) (tactic := "apply Or.inr") with
|
let state3_1 ← match ← state2.execute (goalId := 0) (tactic := "apply Or.inr") with
|
||||||
| .success state => pure state
|
| .success state => pure state
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue