feat: Allow selective continuation of goals #27
|
@ -170,15 +170,18 @@ protected def GoalState.tryAssign (state: GoalState) (goalId: Nat) (expr: String
|
||||||
tacticM { elaborator := .anonymous } |>.run' state.savedState.tactic
|
tacticM { elaborator := .anonymous } |>.run' state.savedState.tactic
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/-- After finishing one branch of a proof (`graftee`), pick up from the point where the proof was left off (`target`) -/
|
/-- After finishing one branch of a proof (`graftee`), pick up from the point where the proof was left off (`target`) -/
|
||||||
protected def GoalState.continue (target: GoalState) (graftee: GoalState): Except String GoalState :=
|
protected def GoalState.continue (target: GoalState) (graftee: GoalState) (goals: Option (List MVarId) := .none): Except String GoalState :=
|
||||||
|
let goals := match goals with
|
||||||
|
| .some goals => goals
|
||||||
|
| .none => target.goals
|
||||||
if target.root != graftee.root then
|
if target.root != graftee.root then
|
||||||
.error s!"Roots of two continued goal states do not match: {target.root.name} != {graftee.root.name}"
|
.error s!"Roots of two continued goal states do not match: {target.root.name} != {graftee.root.name}"
|
||||||
-- Ensure goals are not dangling
|
-- Ensure goals are not dangling
|
||||||
else if ¬ (target.goals.all (λ goal => graftee.mvars.contains goal)) then
|
else if ¬ (goals.all (λ goal => graftee.mvars.contains goal)) then
|
||||||
.error s!"Some goals in target are not present in the graftee"
|
.error s!"Some goals in target are not present in the graftee"
|
||||||
else
|
else
|
||||||
-- Set goals to the goals that have not been assigned yet, similar to the `focus` tactic.
|
-- Set goals to the goals that have not been assigned yet, similar to the `focus` tactic.
|
||||||
let unassigned := target.goals.filter (λ goal =>
|
let unassigned := goals.filter (λ goal =>
|
||||||
let mctx := graftee.mctx
|
let mctx := graftee.mctx
|
||||||
¬(mctx.eAssignment.contains goal || mctx.dAssignment.contains goal))
|
¬(mctx.eAssignment.contains goal || mctx.dAssignment.contains goal))
|
||||||
.ok {
|
.ok {
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
|
||||||
import Pantograph.Protocol
|
import Pantograph.Protocol
|
||||||
|
import Pantograph.Goal
|
||||||
|
import LSpec
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
namespace Pantograph
|
namespace Pantograph
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -15,6 +17,19 @@ def Goal.devolatilize (goal: Goal): Goal :=
|
||||||
v with
|
v with
|
||||||
name := ""
|
name := ""
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
deriving instance DecidableEq, Repr for Expression
|
||||||
|
deriving instance DecidableEq, Repr for Variable
|
||||||
|
deriving instance DecidableEq, Repr for Goal
|
||||||
end Protocol
|
end Protocol
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def TacticResult.toString : TacticResult → String
|
||||||
|
| .success state => s!".success ({state.goals.length} goals)"
|
||||||
|
| .failure messages =>
|
||||||
|
let messages := "\n".intercalate messages.toList
|
||||||
|
s!".failure {messages}"
|
||||||
|
| .parseError error => s!".parseError {error}"
|
||||||
|
| .indexError index => s!".indexError {index}"
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def assertUnreachable (message: String): LSpec.TestSeq := LSpec.check message false
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
end Pantograph
|
end Pantograph
|
||||||
|
|
129
Test/Holes.lean
129
Test/Holes.lean
|
@ -1,31 +1,28 @@
|
||||||
import LSpec
|
import LSpec
|
||||||
import Pantograph.Goal
|
import Pantograph.Goal
|
||||||
import Pantograph.Serial
|
import Pantograph.Serial
|
||||||
|
import Test.Common
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
namespace Pantograph.Test.Holes
|
namespace Pantograph.Test.Holes
|
||||||
open Pantograph
|
open Pantograph
|
||||||
open Lean
|
open Lean
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
abbrev TestM := StateRefT LSpec.TestSeq (ReaderT Commands.Options M)
|
abbrev TestM := StateRefT LSpec.TestSeq (ReaderT Protocol.Options M)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
deriving instance DecidableEq, Repr for Commands.Expression
|
def addTest (test: LSpec.TestSeq): TestM Unit := do
|
||||||
deriving instance DecidableEq, Repr for Commands.Variable
|
|
||||||
deriving instance DecidableEq, Repr for Commands.Goal
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def add_test (test: LSpec.TestSeq): TestM Unit := do
|
|
||||||
set $ (← get) ++ test
|
set $ (← get) ++ test
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def start_goal (hole: String): TestM (Option GoalState) := do
|
def startProof (expr: String): TestM (Option GoalState) := do
|
||||||
let env ← Lean.MonadEnv.getEnv
|
let env ← Lean.MonadEnv.getEnv
|
||||||
let syn? := syntax_from_str env hole
|
let syn? := syntax_from_str env expr
|
||||||
add_test $ LSpec.check s!"Parsing {hole}" (syn?.isOk)
|
addTest $ LSpec.check s!"Parsing {expr}" (syn?.isOk)
|
||||||
match syn? with
|
match syn? with
|
||||||
| .error error =>
|
| .error error =>
|
||||||
IO.println error
|
IO.println error
|
||||||
return Option.none
|
return Option.none
|
||||||
| .ok syn =>
|
| .ok syn =>
|
||||||
let expr? ← syntax_to_expr syn
|
let expr? ← syntax_to_expr_type syn
|
||||||
add_test $ LSpec.check s!"Elaborating" expr?.isOk
|
addTest $ LSpec.check s!"Elaborating" expr?.isOk
|
||||||
match expr? with
|
match expr? with
|
||||||
| .error error =>
|
| .error error =>
|
||||||
IO.println error
|
IO.println error
|
||||||
|
@ -34,40 +31,21 @@ def start_goal (hole: String): TestM (Option GoalState) := do
|
||||||
let goal ← GoalState.create (expr := expr)
|
let goal ← GoalState.create (expr := expr)
|
||||||
return Option.some goal
|
return Option.some goal
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def assert_unreachable (message: String): LSpec.TestSeq := LSpec.check message false
|
def buildGoal (nameType: List (String × String)) (target: String) (userName?: Option String := .none): Protocol.Goal :=
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def build_goal (nameType: List (String × String)) (target: String): Commands.Goal :=
|
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
|
userName?,
|
||||||
target := { pp? := .some target},
|
target := { pp? := .some target},
|
||||||
vars := (nameType.map fun x => ({
|
vars := (nameType.map fun x => ({
|
||||||
name := x.fst,
|
userName := x.fst,
|
||||||
type? := .some { pp? := .some x.snd },
|
type? := .some { pp? := .some x.snd },
|
||||||
isInaccessible? := .some false
|
isInaccessible? := .some false
|
||||||
})).toArray
|
})).toArray
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
-- Like `build_goal` but allow certain variables to be elided.
|
def proofRunner (env: Lean.Environment) (tests: TestM Unit): IO LSpec.TestSeq := do
|
||||||
def build_goal_selective (nameType: List (String × Option String)) (target: String): Commands.Goal :=
|
|
||||||
{
|
|
||||||
target := { pp? := .some target},
|
|
||||||
vars := (nameType.map fun x => ({
|
|
||||||
name := x.fst,
|
|
||||||
type? := x.snd.map (λ type => { pp? := type }),
|
|
||||||
isInaccessible? := x.snd.map (λ _ => false)
|
|
||||||
})).toArray
|
|
||||||
}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def construct_sigma: TestM Unit := do
|
|
||||||
let goal? ← start_goal "∀ (n m: Nat), n + m = m + n"
|
|
||||||
add_test $ LSpec.check "Start goal" goal?.isSome
|
|
||||||
if let .some goal := goal? then
|
|
||||||
return ()
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def proof_runner (env: Lean.Environment) (tests: TestM Unit): IO LSpec.TestSeq := do
|
|
||||||
let termElabM := tests.run LSpec.TestSeq.done |>.run {} -- with default options
|
let termElabM := tests.run LSpec.TestSeq.done |>.run {} -- with default options
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let coreContext: Lean.Core.Context := {
|
let coreContext: Lean.Core.Context := {
|
||||||
currNamespace := str_to_name "Aniva",
|
currNamespace := Name.append .anonymous "Aniva",
|
||||||
openDecls := [], -- No 'open' directives needed
|
openDecls := [], -- No 'open' directives needed
|
||||||
fileName := "<Pantograph>",
|
fileName := "<Pantograph>",
|
||||||
fileMap := { source := "", positions := #[0], lines := #[1] }
|
fileMap := { source := "", positions := #[0], lines := #[1] }
|
||||||
|
@ -83,17 +61,94 @@ def proof_runner (env: Lean.Environment) (tests: TestM Unit): IO LSpec.TestSeq :
|
||||||
| .ok (_, a) =>
|
| .ok (_, a) =>
|
||||||
return a
|
return a
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/-- M-coupled goals -/
|
||||||
|
def test_m_couple: TestM Unit := do
|
||||||
|
let state? ← startProof "(2: Nat) ≤ 5"
|
||||||
|
let state0 ← match state? with
|
||||||
|
| .some state => pure state
|
||||||
|
| .none => do
|
||||||
|
addTest $ assertUnreachable "Goal could not parse"
|
||||||
|
return ()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
let state1 ← match ← state0.execute (goalId := 0) (tactic := "apply Nat.le_trans") with
|
||||||
|
| .success state => pure state
|
||||||
|
| other => do
|
||||||
|
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
||||||
|
return ()
|
||||||
|
addTest $ LSpec.check "apply Nat.le_trans" ((← state1.serializeGoals (options := ← read)).map (·.target.pp?) =
|
||||||
|
#[.some "2 ≤ ?m", .some "?m ≤ 5", .some "Nat"])
|
||||||
|
addTest $ LSpec.test "(1 root)" state1.rootExpr?.isNone
|
||||||
|
-- Set m to 3
|
||||||
|
let state2 ← match ← state1.execute (goalId := 2) (tactic := "exact 3") with
|
||||||
|
| .success state => pure state
|
||||||
|
| other => do
|
||||||
|
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
||||||
|
return ()
|
||||||
|
addTest $ LSpec.test "(1b root)" state2.rootExpr?.isNone
|
||||||
|
let state1b ← match state1.continue state2 with
|
||||||
|
| .error msg => do
|
||||||
|
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ msg
|
||||||
|
return ()
|
||||||
|
| .ok state => pure state
|
||||||
|
addTest $ LSpec.check "exact 3" ((← state1b.serializeGoals (options := ← read)).map (·.target.pp?) =
|
||||||
|
#[.some "2 ≤ 3", .some "3 ≤ 5"])
|
||||||
|
addTest $ LSpec.test "(2 root)" state1b.rootExpr?.isNone
|
||||||
|
return ()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
def test_proposition_generation: TestM Unit := do
|
||||||
|
let state? ← startProof "Σ' p:Prop, p"
|
||||||
|
let state0 ← match state? with
|
||||||
|
| .some state => pure state
|
||||||
|
| .none => do
|
||||||
|
addTest $ assertUnreachable "Goal could not parse"
|
||||||
|
return ()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
let state1 ← match ← state0.execute (goalId := 0) (tactic := "apply PSigma.mk") with
|
||||||
|
| .success state => pure state
|
||||||
|
| other => do
|
||||||
|
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
||||||
|
return ()
|
||||||
|
addTest $ LSpec.check "apply PSigma.mk" ((← state1.serializeGoals (options := ← read)).map (·.devolatilize) =
|
||||||
|
#[
|
||||||
|
buildGoal [] "?fst" (userName? := .some "snd"),
|
||||||
|
buildGoal [] "Prop" (userName? := .some "fst")
|
||||||
|
])
|
||||||
|
if let #[goal1, goal2] := ← state1.serializeGoals (options := { (← read) with printExprAST := true }) then
|
||||||
|
addTest $ LSpec.test "(1 reference)" (goal1.target.sexp? = .some s!"(:mv {goal2.name})")
|
||||||
|
addTest $ LSpec.test "(1 root)" state1.rootExpr?.isNone
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
let state2 ← match ← state1.tryAssign (goalId := 0) (expr := "λ (x: Nat) => _") with
|
||||||
|
| .success state => pure state
|
||||||
|
| other => do
|
||||||
|
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
||||||
|
return ()
|
||||||
|
addTest $ LSpec.check ":= λ (x: Nat), _" ((← state2.serializeGoals (options := ← read)).map (·.target.pp?) =
|
||||||
|
#[.some "Nat → Prop", .some "∀ (x : Nat), ?m.29 x"])
|
||||||
|
addTest $ LSpec.test "(2 root)" state2.rootExpr?.isNone
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
let state3 ← match ← state2.tryAssign (goalId := 1) (expr := "fun x => Eq.refl x") with
|
||||||
|
| .success state => pure state
|
||||||
|
| other => do
|
||||||
|
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
||||||
|
return ()
|
||||||
|
addTest $ LSpec.check ":= Eq.refl" ((← state3.serializeGoals (options := ← read)).map (·.target.pp?) =
|
||||||
|
#[])
|
||||||
|
addTest $ LSpec.test "(3 root)" state3.rootExpr?.isSome
|
||||||
|
return ()
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def suite: IO LSpec.TestSeq := do
|
def suite: IO LSpec.TestSeq := do
|
||||||
let env: Lean.Environment ← Lean.importModules
|
let env: Lean.Environment ← Lean.importModules
|
||||||
(imports := #["Init"].map (λ str => { module := str_to_name str, runtimeOnly := false }))
|
(imports := #["Init"].map (λ str => { module := str_to_name str, runtimeOnly := false }))
|
||||||
(opts := {})
|
(opts := {})
|
||||||
(trustLevel := 1)
|
(trustLevel := 1)
|
||||||
let tests := [
|
let tests := [
|
||||||
("Σ'", construct_sigma)
|
("2 < 5", test_m_couple),
|
||||||
|
("Proposition Generation", test_proposition_generation)
|
||||||
]
|
]
|
||||||
let tests ← tests.foldlM (fun acc tests => do
|
let tests ← tests.foldlM (fun acc tests => do
|
||||||
let (name, tests) := tests
|
let (name, tests) := tests
|
||||||
let tests ← proof_runner env tests
|
let tests ← proofRunner env tests
|
||||||
return acc ++ (LSpec.group name tests)) LSpec.TestSeq.done
|
return acc ++ (LSpec.group name tests)) LSpec.TestSeq.done
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
return LSpec.group "Holes" tests
|
return LSpec.group "Holes" tests
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||||
import LSpec
|
import LSpec
|
||||||
--import Test.Holes
|
import Test.Holes
|
||||||
import Test.Integration
|
import Test.Integration
|
||||||
import Test.Proofs
|
import Test.Proofs
|
||||||
import Test.Serial
|
import Test.Serial
|
||||||
|
@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ unsafe def main := do
|
||||||
Lean.initSearchPath (← Lean.findSysroot)
|
Lean.initSearchPath (← Lean.findSysroot)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let suites := [
|
let suites := [
|
||||||
--Holes.suite,
|
Holes.suite,
|
||||||
Integration.suite,
|
Integration.suite,
|
||||||
Proofs.suite,
|
Proofs.suite,
|
||||||
Serial.suite
|
Serial.suite
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -6,17 +6,6 @@ import Pantograph.Goal
|
||||||
import Pantograph.Serial
|
import Pantograph.Serial
|
||||||
import Test.Common
|
import Test.Common
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
namespace Pantograph
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def TacticResult.toString : TacticResult → String
|
|
||||||
| .success state => s!".success ({state.goals.length} goals)"
|
|
||||||
| .failure messages =>
|
|
||||||
let messages := "\n".intercalate messages.toList
|
|
||||||
s!".failure {messages}"
|
|
||||||
| .parseError error => s!".parseError {error}"
|
|
||||||
| .indexError index => s!".indexError {index}"
|
|
||||||
end Pantograph
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
namespace Pantograph.Test.Proofs
|
namespace Pantograph.Test.Proofs
|
||||||
open Pantograph
|
open Pantograph
|
||||||
open Lean
|
open Lean
|
||||||
|
@ -27,10 +16,6 @@ inductive Start where
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
abbrev TestM := StateRefT LSpec.TestSeq (ReaderT Protocol.Options M)
|
abbrev TestM := StateRefT LSpec.TestSeq (ReaderT Protocol.Options M)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
deriving instance DecidableEq, Repr for Protocol.Expression
|
|
||||||
deriving instance DecidableEq, Repr for Protocol.Variable
|
|
||||||
deriving instance DecidableEq, Repr for Protocol.Goal
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def addTest (test: LSpec.TestSeq): TestM Unit := do
|
def addTest (test: LSpec.TestSeq): TestM Unit := do
|
||||||
set $ (← get) ++ test
|
set $ (← get) ++ test
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -64,8 +49,6 @@ def startProof (start: Start): TestM (Option GoalState) := do
|
||||||
let goal ← GoalState.create (expr := expr)
|
let goal ← GoalState.create (expr := expr)
|
||||||
return Option.some goal
|
return Option.some goal
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def assertUnreachable (message: String): LSpec.TestSeq := LSpec.check message false
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def buildGoal (nameType: List (String × String)) (target: String) (userName?: Option String := .none): Protocol.Goal :=
|
def buildGoal (nameType: List (String × String)) (target: String) (userName?: Option String := .none): Protocol.Goal :=
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
userName?,
|
userName?,
|
||||||
|
@ -303,80 +286,6 @@ def proof_or_comm: TestM Unit := do
|
||||||
]
|
]
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/-- M-coupled goals -/
|
|
||||||
def proof_m_couple: TestM Unit := do
|
|
||||||
let state? ← startProof (.expr "(2: Nat) ≤ 5")
|
|
||||||
let state0 ← match state? with
|
|
||||||
| .some state => pure state
|
|
||||||
| .none => do
|
|
||||||
addTest $ assertUnreachable "Goal could not parse"
|
|
||||||
return ()
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let state1 ← match ← state0.execute (goalId := 0) (tactic := "apply Nat.le_trans") with
|
|
||||||
| .success state => pure state
|
|
||||||
| other => do
|
|
||||||
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
|
||||||
return ()
|
|
||||||
addTest $ LSpec.check "apply Nat.le_trans" ((← state1.serializeGoals (options := ← read)).map (·.target.pp?) =
|
|
||||||
#[.some "2 ≤ ?m", .some "?m ≤ 5", .some "Nat"])
|
|
||||||
addTest $ LSpec.test "(1 root)" state1.rootExpr?.isNone
|
|
||||||
-- Set m to 3
|
|
||||||
let state2 ← match ← state1.execute (goalId := 2) (tactic := "exact 3") with
|
|
||||||
| .success state => pure state
|
|
||||||
| other => do
|
|
||||||
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
|
||||||
return ()
|
|
||||||
addTest $ LSpec.test "(1b root)" state2.rootExpr?.isNone
|
|
||||||
let state1b ← match state1.continue state2 with
|
|
||||||
| .error msg => do
|
|
||||||
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ msg
|
|
||||||
return ()
|
|
||||||
| .ok state => pure state
|
|
||||||
addTest $ LSpec.check "exact 3" ((← state1b.serializeGoals (options := ← read)).map (·.target.pp?) =
|
|
||||||
#[.some "2 ≤ 3", .some "3 ≤ 5"])
|
|
||||||
addTest $ LSpec.test "(2 root)" state1b.rootExpr?.isNone
|
|
||||||
return ()
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def proof_proposition_generation: TestM Unit := do
|
|
||||||
let state? ← startProof (.expr "Σ' p:Prop, p")
|
|
||||||
let state0 ← match state? with
|
|
||||||
| .some state => pure state
|
|
||||||
| .none => do
|
|
||||||
addTest $ assertUnreachable "Goal could not parse"
|
|
||||||
return ()
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let state1 ← match ← state0.execute (goalId := 0) (tactic := "apply PSigma.mk") with
|
|
||||||
| .success state => pure state
|
|
||||||
| other => do
|
|
||||||
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
|
||||||
return ()
|
|
||||||
addTest $ LSpec.check "apply PSigma.mk" ((← state1.serializeGoals (options := ← read)).map (·.devolatilize) =
|
|
||||||
#[
|
|
||||||
buildGoal [] "?fst" (userName? := .some "snd"),
|
|
||||||
buildGoal [] "Prop" (userName? := .some "fst")
|
|
||||||
])
|
|
||||||
if let #[goal1, goal2] := ← state1.serializeGoals (options := { (← read) with printExprAST := true }) then
|
|
||||||
addTest $ LSpec.test "(1 reference)" (goal1.target.sexp? = .some s!"(:mv {goal2.name})")
|
|
||||||
addTest $ LSpec.test "(1 root)" state1.rootExpr?.isNone
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let state2 ← match ← state1.tryAssign (goalId := 0) (expr := "λ (x: Nat) => _") with
|
|
||||||
| .success state => pure state
|
|
||||||
| other => do
|
|
||||||
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
|
||||||
return ()
|
|
||||||
addTest $ LSpec.check ":= λ (x: Nat), _" ((← state2.serializeGoals (options := ← read)).map (·.target.pp?) =
|
|
||||||
#[.some "Nat → Prop", .some "∀ (x : Nat), ?m.29 x"])
|
|
||||||
addTest $ LSpec.test "(2 root)" state2.rootExpr?.isNone
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
let state3 ← match ← state2.tryAssign (goalId := 1) (expr := "fun x => Eq.refl x") with
|
|
||||||
| .success state => pure state
|
|
||||||
| other => do
|
|
||||||
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
|
||||||
return ()
|
|
||||||
addTest $ LSpec.check ":= Eq.refl" ((← state3.serializeGoals (options := ← read)).map (·.target.pp?) =
|
|
||||||
#[])
|
|
||||||
addTest $ LSpec.test "(3 root)" state3.rootExpr?.isSome
|
|
||||||
return ()
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
def suite: IO LSpec.TestSeq := do
|
def suite: IO LSpec.TestSeq := do
|
||||||
let env: Lean.Environment ← Lean.importModules
|
let env: Lean.Environment ← Lean.importModules
|
||||||
|
@ -388,9 +297,7 @@ def suite: IO LSpec.TestSeq := do
|
||||||
("Nat.add_comm manual", proof_nat_add_comm true),
|
("Nat.add_comm manual", proof_nat_add_comm true),
|
||||||
("Nat.add_comm delta", proof_delta_variable),
|
("Nat.add_comm delta", proof_delta_variable),
|
||||||
("arithmetic", proof_arith),
|
("arithmetic", proof_arith),
|
||||||
("Or.comm", proof_or_comm),
|
("Or.comm", proof_or_comm)
|
||||||
("2 < 5", proof_m_couple),
|
|
||||||
("Proposition Generation", proof_proposition_generation)
|
|
||||||
]
|
]
|
||||||
let tests ← tests.foldlM (fun acc tests => do
|
let tests ← tests.foldlM (fun acc tests => do
|
||||||
let (name, tests) := tests
|
let (name, tests) := tests
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue