292 lines
11 KiB
Plaintext
292 lines
11 KiB
Plaintext
/-
|
||
Tests pertaining to goals with no interdependencies
|
||
-/
|
||
import LSpec
|
||
import Pantograph.Goal
|
||
import Pantograph.Serial
|
||
|
||
namespace Pantograph
|
||
|
||
def TacticResult.toString : TacticResult → String
|
||
| .success _ goals => s!".success ({goals.size} goals)"
|
||
| .failure messages =>
|
||
let messages := "\n".intercalate messages.toList
|
||
s!".failure {messages}"
|
||
| .parseError error => s!".parseError {error}"
|
||
| .indexError index => s!".indexError {index}"
|
||
end Pantograph
|
||
|
||
namespace Pantograph.Test.Proofs
|
||
open Pantograph
|
||
open Lean
|
||
|
||
inductive Start where
|
||
| copy (name: String) -- Start from some name in the environment
|
||
| expr (expr: String) -- Start from some expression
|
||
|
||
abbrev TestM := StateRefT LSpec.TestSeq (ReaderT Protocol.Options M)
|
||
|
||
deriving instance DecidableEq, Repr for Protocol.Expression
|
||
deriving instance DecidableEq, Repr for Protocol.Variable
|
||
deriving instance DecidableEq, Repr for Protocol.Goal
|
||
|
||
def addTest (test: LSpec.TestSeq): TestM Unit := do
|
||
set $ (← get) ++ test
|
||
|
||
def startProof (start: Start): TestM (Option GoalState) := do
|
||
let env ← Lean.MonadEnv.getEnv
|
||
match start with
|
||
| .copy name =>
|
||
let cInfo? := str_to_name name |> env.find?
|
||
addTest $ LSpec.check s!"Symbol exists {name}" cInfo?.isSome
|
||
match cInfo? with
|
||
| .some cInfo =>
|
||
let goal ← GoalState.create (expr := cInfo.type)
|
||
return Option.some goal
|
||
| .none =>
|
||
return Option.none
|
||
| .expr expr =>
|
||
let syn? := syntax_from_str env expr
|
||
addTest $ LSpec.check s!"Parsing {expr}" (syn?.isOk)
|
||
match syn? with
|
||
| .error error =>
|
||
IO.println error
|
||
return Option.none
|
||
| .ok syn =>
|
||
let expr? ← syntax_to_expr_type syn
|
||
addTest $ LSpec.check s!"Elaborating" expr?.isOk
|
||
match expr? with
|
||
| .error error =>
|
||
IO.println error
|
||
return Option.none
|
||
| .ok expr =>
|
||
let goal ← GoalState.create (expr := expr)
|
||
return Option.some goal
|
||
|
||
def assertUnreachable (message: String): LSpec.TestSeq := LSpec.check message false
|
||
|
||
def buildGoal (nameType: List (String × String)) (target: String): Protocol.Goal :=
|
||
{
|
||
target := { pp? := .some target},
|
||
vars := (nameType.map fun x => ({
|
||
name := x.fst,
|
||
type? := .some { pp? := .some x.snd },
|
||
isInaccessible? := .some false
|
||
})).toArray
|
||
}
|
||
-- Like `buildGoal` but allow certain variables to be elided.
|
||
def buildGoalSelective (nameType: List (String × Option String)) (target: String): Protocol.Goal :=
|
||
{
|
||
target := { pp? := .some target},
|
||
vars := (nameType.map fun x => ({
|
||
name := x.fst,
|
||
type? := x.snd.map (λ type => { pp? := type }),
|
||
isInaccessible? := x.snd.map (λ _ => false)
|
||
})).toArray
|
||
}
|
||
def proofRunner (env: Lean.Environment) (tests: TestM Unit): IO LSpec.TestSeq := do
|
||
let termElabM := tests.run LSpec.TestSeq.done |>.run {} -- with default options
|
||
|
||
let coreContext: Lean.Core.Context := {
|
||
currNamespace := Name.append .anonymous "Aniva",
|
||
openDecls := [], -- No 'open' directives needed
|
||
fileName := "<Pantograph>",
|
||
fileMap := { source := "", positions := #[0], lines := #[1] }
|
||
}
|
||
let metaM := termElabM.run' (ctx := {
|
||
declName? := some "_pantograph",
|
||
errToSorry := false
|
||
})
|
||
let coreM := metaM.run'
|
||
match ← (coreM.run' coreContext { env := env }).toBaseIO with
|
||
| .error exception =>
|
||
return LSpec.test "Exception" (s!"internal exception #{← exception.toMessageData.toString}" = "")
|
||
| .ok (_, a) =>
|
||
return a
|
||
|
||
|
||
-- Individual test cases
|
||
example: ∀ (a b: Nat), a + b = b + a := by
|
||
intro n m
|
||
rw [Nat.add_comm]
|
||
def proof_nat_add_comm (manual: Bool): TestM Unit := do
|
||
let state? ← startProof <| match manual with
|
||
| false => .copy "Nat.add_comm"
|
||
| true => .expr "∀ (a b: Nat), a + b = b + a"
|
||
addTest $ LSpec.check "Start goal" state?.isSome
|
||
let state0 ← match state? with
|
||
| .some state => pure state
|
||
| .none => do
|
||
addTest $ assertUnreachable "Goal could not parse"
|
||
return ()
|
||
|
||
let (state1, goal1) ← match ← state0.execute (goalId := 0) (tactic := "intro n m") with
|
||
| .success state #[goal] => pure (state, goal)
|
||
| other => do
|
||
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
||
return ()
|
||
addTest $ LSpec.check "intro n m" (goal1 = buildGoal [("n", "Nat"), ("m", "Nat")] "n + m = m + n")
|
||
|
||
match ← state1.execute (goalId := 0) (tactic := "assumption") with
|
||
| .failure #[message] =>
|
||
addTest $ LSpec.check "assumption" (message = "tactic 'assumption' failed\nn m : Nat\n⊢ n + m = m + n")
|
||
| other => do
|
||
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
||
|
||
let state2 ← match ← state1.execute (goalId := 0) (tactic := "rw [Nat.add_comm]") with
|
||
| .success state #[] => pure state
|
||
| other => do
|
||
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
||
return ()
|
||
|
||
return ()
|
||
|
||
|
||
-- Two ways to write the same theorem
|
||
example: ∀ (p q: Prop), p ∨ q → q ∨ p := by
|
||
intro p q h
|
||
cases h
|
||
apply Or.inr
|
||
assumption
|
||
apply Or.inl
|
||
assumption
|
||
example: ∀ (p q: Prop), p ∨ q → q ∨ p := by
|
||
intro p q h
|
||
cases h
|
||
. apply Or.inr
|
||
assumption
|
||
. apply Or.inl
|
||
assumption
|
||
def proof_or_comm: TestM Unit := do
|
||
let state? ← startProof (.expr "∀ (p q: Prop), p ∨ q → q ∨ p")
|
||
let state0 ← match state? with
|
||
| .some state => pure state
|
||
| .none => do
|
||
addTest $ assertUnreachable "Goal could not parse"
|
||
return ()
|
||
|
||
let (state1, goal1) ← match ← state0.execute (goalId := 0) (tactic := "intro p q h") with
|
||
| .success state #[goal] => pure (state, goal)
|
||
| other => do
|
||
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
||
return ()
|
||
addTest $ LSpec.check "p q h" (goal1 = buildGoal [("p", "Prop"), ("q", "Prop"), ("h", "p ∨ q")] "q ∨ p")
|
||
let (state2, goal1, goal2) ← match ← state1.execute (goalId := 0) (tactic := "cases h") with
|
||
| .success state #[goal1, goal2] => pure (state, goal1, goal2)
|
||
| other => do
|
||
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
||
return ()
|
||
addTest $ LSpec.check "cases h/1" (goal1 = branchGoal "inl" "p")
|
||
addTest $ LSpec.check "cases h/2" (goal2 = branchGoal "inr" "q")
|
||
|
||
let (state3_1, _goal) ← match ← state2.execute (goalId := 0) (tactic := "apply Or.inr") with
|
||
| .success state #[goal] => pure (state, goal)
|
||
| other => do
|
||
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
||
return ()
|
||
let state4_1 ← match ← state3_1.execute (goalId := 0) (tactic := "assumption") with
|
||
| .success state #[] => pure state
|
||
| other => do
|
||
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
||
return ()
|
||
let (state3_2, _goal) ← match ← state2.execute (goalId := 1) (tactic := "apply Or.inl") with
|
||
| .success state #[goal] => pure (state, goal)
|
||
| other => do
|
||
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
||
return ()
|
||
let state4_2 ← match ← state3_2.execute (goalId := 0) (tactic := "assumption") with
|
||
| .success state #[] => pure state
|
||
| other => do
|
||
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
||
return ()
|
||
|
||
-- Ensure the proof can continue from `state4_2`.
|
||
let state2b ← match state2.continue state4_2 with
|
||
| .error msg => do
|
||
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ msg
|
||
return ()
|
||
| .ok state => pure state
|
||
addTest $ LSpec.test "state2b" (state2b.goals == [state2.goals.get! 0])
|
||
let (state3_1, _goal) ← match ← state2b.execute (goalId := 0) (tactic := "apply Or.inr") with
|
||
| .success state #[goal] => pure (state, goal)
|
||
| other => do
|
||
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
||
return ()
|
||
let state4_1 ← match ← state3_1.execute (goalId := 0) (tactic := "assumption") with
|
||
| .success state #[] => pure state
|
||
| other => do
|
||
addTest $ assertUnreachable $ other.toString
|
||
return ()
|
||
IO.println "===== 4_1 ====="
|
||
state4_1.print ({ printNonVisible := false })
|
||
|
||
return ()
|
||
where
|
||
typeProp: Protocol.Expression := { pp? := .some "Prop" }
|
||
branchGoal (caseName name: String): Protocol.Goal := {
|
||
caseName? := .some caseName,
|
||
target := { pp? := .some "q ∨ p" },
|
||
vars := #[
|
||
{ name := "p", type? := .some typeProp, isInaccessible? := .some false },
|
||
{ name := "q", type? := .some typeProp, isInaccessible? := .some false },
|
||
{ name := "h✝", type? := .some { pp? := .some name }, isInaccessible? := .some true }
|
||
]
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
--example (w x y z : Nat) (p : Nat → Prop)
|
||
-- (h : p (x * y + z * w * x)) : p (x * w * z + y * x) := by
|
||
-- simp [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_left_comm, Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm] at *
|
||
-- assumption
|
||
--def proof_arith_1: TestM Unit := do
|
||
-- let goal? ← startProof (.expr "∀ (w x y z : Nat) (p : Nat → Prop) (h : p (x * y + z * w * x)), p (x * w * z + y * x)")
|
||
-- addTest $ LSpec.check "Start goal" goal?.isSome
|
||
-- if let .some goal := goal? then
|
||
-- if let .success #[(goal, _)] ← goal.execute "intros" then
|
||
-- if let .success #[(goal, _)] ← goal.execute "simp [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_left_comm, Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm] at *" then
|
||
-- if let .success #[] ← goal.execute "assumption" then
|
||
-- return ()
|
||
-- else
|
||
-- addTest $ assertUnreachable "assumption"
|
||
-- else
|
||
-- addTest $ assertUnreachable "simp ..."
|
||
-- else
|
||
-- addTest $ assertUnreachable "intros"
|
||
--
|
||
--def proof_delta_variable: TestM Unit := withReader (fun _ => {proofVariableDelta := true}) do
|
||
-- let goal? ← startProof (.expr "∀ (a b: Nat), a + b = b + a")
|
||
-- addTest $ LSpec.check "Start goal" goal?.isSome
|
||
-- if let .some goal := goal? then
|
||
-- if let .success #[(goal, sGoal)] ← goal.execute "intro n" then
|
||
-- let sGoal1e: Protocol.Goal :=buildGoalSelective [("n", .some "Nat")] "∀ (b : Nat), n + b = b + n"
|
||
-- addTest $ LSpec.check "intro n" (sGoal = sGoal1e)
|
||
--
|
||
-- if let .success #[(_, sGoal)] ← goal.execute "intro m" then
|
||
-- let sGoal2e: Protocol.Goal :=buildGoalSelective [("n", .none), ("m", .some "Nat")] "n + m = m + n"
|
||
-- addTest $ LSpec.check "intro m" (sGoal = sGoal2e)
|
||
-- else
|
||
-- addTest $ assertUnreachable "intro m"
|
||
-- else
|
||
-- addTest $ assertUnreachable "intro n"
|
||
|
||
/-- Tests the most basic form of proofs whose goals do not relate to each other -/
|
||
def suite: IO LSpec.TestSeq := do
|
||
let env: Lean.Environment ← Lean.importModules
|
||
(imports := #[{ module := Name.append .anonymous "Init", runtimeOnly := false}])
|
||
(opts := {})
|
||
(trustLevel := 1)
|
||
let tests := [
|
||
("Nat.add_comm", proof_nat_add_comm false),
|
||
("Nat.add_comm manual", proof_nat_add_comm true),
|
||
("Or.comm", proof_or_comm)
|
||
--("arithmetic 1", proof_arith_1),
|
||
--("delta variable", proof_delta_variable)
|
||
]
|
||
let tests ← tests.foldlM (fun acc tests => do
|
||
let (name, tests) := tests
|
||
let tests ← proofRunner env tests
|
||
return acc ++ (LSpec.group name tests)) LSpec.TestSeq.done
|
||
|
||
return LSpec.group "Proofs" tests
|
||
|
||
end Pantograph.Test.Proofs
|